I visited the Museum of the Bible in Washington DC near Federal Center SW on the first day of Winter, Dec. 21, and after the visit noticed the book by Steve and Jackie Green, founders of the museum, in the museum gift shop. The title, on a brown dust jacket, caught my attention. That is, “This Dangerous Book: How the BIBLE Has Shaped our World, and Why It Still Matters Today”.
My first thought was that Milo Yiannopoulos titled his book “Dangerous” and names his own publishing company that (he has published Pam Geller), and now his own main website, that. In terms of world history, the Bible is a lot more dangerous than Milo’s work! I really wondered if this title duplication was more than a coincidence. As a matter of law, titles cannot be copyrighted, and normally they only become trademarked if they become a series. (That raises a question about my own “Do Ask, Do Tell”). Business company names (like publishing companies) normally can be trademarked. So sometimes their accompanying domain names are, too.
Steve and Jackie are part of a larger family, David’s, that founded the Hobby Lobby, which became controversial in refusing to cover the “morning-after pill” for employees claiming it was an abortifacient. So here we go, into the area of how much religious beliefs should affect your treatment of other people (like employees) on their private decisions.
The Museum is quite objective and neutral, covering both Judaism and Christianity well, but Islam much less because Islam has its own texts.
The book is partly about the history of Biblical codices and manuscripts (through the significance of the innovation of the printing press), and partly about the Green family’s own journey of faith and perspective on it. The Green’s talk about their early life expenses of debt, and how it is hard to avoid when you have five children. (Note: single people, and in the past, many gays, tended to taken on fewer responsibilities for others that can lead to debt. That’s changing with longer life spans, demographics, eldercare, and marriage law.) Later they talk about prayer in whether to adopt a child from China, which turned out to be tricky legally. The oldest natural sibling seemed to think that the parents were morally obliged to try to do so. This is emotionally a close-knit family, in a way that I haven’t experienced.
I recall a particular moment, the first time I entered my tenth grade English classroom in September 1958, and saw a lot of classic books on a shelf, with a young adult male teacher. (Yes, he had played football but he was academically very well prepared. This reminds me of a college athlete I met on a Metro in 2014 as he read a philosophy text. Yup, a lot of “jocks” really are smart, too. And that happened about the time of GWU’s annual Day of Service. A lot flashes through the mind.) Ever since then, I’ve wondered if some books deserve to be thought of as “good” and having more credibility to be believed by the public than others. I can wonder that about my own “Do Ask Do Tell” series.
I can recall a 90’s book, “The Good Book” (legacy review), by African-American Harvard religion professor Peter Gomes, who also describes his coming out as gay. I remember reading this book when I wrote my own first DADT book.
So then, I ponder, as the Green book explores, do you look at the Bible as a source of authority on moral judgements? The Greens get into that, and try to maintain some flexibility. The assorted literary forms in the Bible (especially New Testament letters) add to the authority. (The remarks about John’s account of the Revelations seem particularly challenging.) But for Christians this comes down to a personal “relationship” with and faith in “Him”.
Consider this: for most of my life, Jesus has usually been depicted visually as a slender, physically fit young adult white male. As a gay white male myself, that image is what I would tend to want “upward affiliation” (to borrow a term from George Gilder) with. Suppose I encounter a young adult white male somewhat like an extension of the teenage Clark Kent in the WB “Smallville” series. What if the individual shows “powers”. Actually, I can think of two such persons now. No, I won’t identify them (and, Milo, sorry, he’s not you). I am very careful about my connection to such a person, not wanting to blow it. For example, nothing gets carried out on social media (so far). (As far as I’m concerned, we don’t know that “Smallville”, with the help of a nearby wormhole to deal with the speed of light, is impossible. The legal rights of personhood for an “alien” like Clark Kent would an interesting question for the courts, and challenging to Donald Trump. We have not treated orcas well.) But a “Clark Kent” would never ask anyone to drop everything an “follow me”.
For someone who lived and experienced his own personhood at the time of Christ however, the miracles, including resurrection and ascension, would seem to be unchallenged and ultimate factual truths. There would be no other frame of reference for knowledge, like modern physics and cosmology. And there could be no nuclear weapons. No dependence on technology to be wiped away by an enemy with some unprecedented act.
I want to note with some interest that the authors consider the course of American history as underlined by the contents of the Bible, from the American revolution (they even make observations about the end of the French and Indian Wars) to the story of Amistad (the book and 1997 film by Steven Spielberg, legacy review), two decades before the War Between the States.
Here is my legacy review of Rick Warren’s “The Purpose-Driven Life” (2002). The problem is, sometimes, it really needs to be “about me.”
|Author:||Steve and Jackie Green, with Bill High; Foreword by Rick Warren|
|Title, Subtitle:||“This Dangerous Book: How the BIBLE Has Shaped our World and Why It Still Matters Today”|
|Publication:||Zonervan (Harper Collins); 5 Parts, 18 Chapters, 251 pages, hardcover (also audio and ebook); many color photos and color maps.|
(Posted: Friday, January 5, 2018 at 1:34 PM EST)