The original “Blade Runner” (1982), directed by Ridley Scott, based on Philip K. Dick’s novel “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sleep?”, had an interesting premise, that ranged far and due to happen soon, om 2019; a blade runner would track down slave replicants who had stolen a space ship and “illegally” (Trump-like) returned to Earth to look for their creator. I saw the original film at Northpark in Dallas.
The newer film “Blade Runner 2049”, directed by French Canadian Denis Villeneuve, was necessary to reset the calendar. It starts out by showing up an eyeball, and then a huge array of solar panels in a very smoggy California desert, before a vigorous young LAPD detective named “K” (Ryan Gosling) tracks down rogue replicant Sapper Morton (Dave Bautista) and winds the hand-to-hand battle, tearing out walls in a remote desert house, before finding human remains.
The movie seem sets up is premise, which is geographically limiting. The older replicants were to be retired and eliminated, and the newer ones are integrated into society. But soon K gets information on a missing veteran replicant Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), and discovers that replicants can actually reproduce. K’s adventures lead him to a particular ogre, Nilander Wallace (Jared Leto), who sets up a demonstration of a holographic pregnancy surrounded by disembodied black crawling eyes as if they were partial creature remnants themselves. (There was a horror film “The Crawling Eye” on “Chiller” in the early 60.s). There is curious terminology that calls the new replicants “angels”.
K moves between the city, modern LA, and a work farm out in the Mojave Desert, where kids (“proles”) are trained in a massive work farm, to burned out Las Vegas (“Cibola” from Stephen King’s “The Stand”). There is a critical scene with the Luxor (where I stayed in 1997) in the distance), which is ironically across the street from the rampage on Oct. 1. Coincidence?
Some of the scenes, with bizarre alien structures laid across the desert, are impressive, but most of the time in this film, you don’t really know where you are going. But it is the psychological composition of the people that gets interesting. First of all, K has gradually come to realize that he is a replicant himself. He is told he has no soul by a supervisor (Robin Wright), and that some of his childhood memories were implanted digitally.
Yet, K seems psychologically intact. He may have mild Asperger’s, but he is really quite likeable and self-aware, and seems to have a certain intellectual integrity that doesn’t require close involvement with other people. It’s almost like he is a kind of Alan Turning, or maybe “The Good Doctor”. He could be fine as your best friend. Relationships with women turn out to be fantasy pieces with holograms, but why not. He doesn’t seem inclined to reproduce, but has discovered that maybe he is supposed to. It’s not hard to imagine how this kind of film could have used a gay subplot.
The movie would beg the question, what really gives someone an identity? If your memories could be transferred (like by a virus) to someone else’s brain, could you wake up perceiving yourself in that person’s body. It would be a good way for a 70 year old to become 21 again. With a finite list of souls, no one dies, and there is no need for reproduction. But then you don’t do your part dealing with the entropy of the universe. Inevitability of death is tied to life.
I saw the film at Tyson’s AMC in 3-D, having left Friday’s just before the Washington Nationals came up with their winning home run rally in the game I was watching on a plasma screen during dinner.
The film was produced by Columbia Pictures (and Alcon, and Scott-Free) and has plenty of references to Sony products. It is distributed by Warner Brothers. The introduction dispensed with the trademark music and went right into the Hans Zimmer’s bizarre musical world of sliding scales (more dissonant than the 1982 score by Vangelis). The music score often quotes Prokofiev’s March from “The Love of Three Oranges”
Previewers of the film were required to sign unusual non-disclosure agreements of certain spoilers, but they probably don’t matter much now.
|Name:||“Blade Runner 2049“|
|Director, writer:||Denis Villeneuve, DGC|
|Format:||2.35:1, Imax, 3D|
|When and how viewed:||AMC Tysons 2017-10-7, evening, ample crowd|
|Companies:||Warner Brothers, Columbia Pictures, Alcon, Scott-Free|
(Posted: Sunday, Oct. 8, 2017 at 4:30 PM EDT)